|
|
Updating ...
BROWN BLIGHT
Brown Blight
[Drechslera
siccans]
SYMPTOMS
Brown
blight is a disease that occurs on perennial ryegrass during cool, wet, and
cloudy periods in the spring or fall. Brown blight is a ‘Helminthosporium’
disease, which is a complex of diseases caused by fungi that produce large,
cigar-shaped spores. Symptoms of brown blight initially appear as small, brown,
round or oval spots on the perennial ryegrass leaves. As the disease
progresses, the lesions expand and become more numerous, causing a brown or
yellowish brown dieback of entire leaves or plants. This foliar blight stage
appears in irregular patterns, although certain ‘hot spots’ may be more
severely damaged than others.
|
brown blight of perennial ryegrass
|
Characteristic
|
Description
|
|
Host
Grass Species
|
perennial
ryegrass
|
|
Month(s)
with symptoms
|
March
to May, Sept to Nov
|
|
Stand
Symptoms
|
spots,
irregular distribution across turf stand
|
|
Foliar
Symptoms - Location/Shape
|
round
or oval leaf spots, blighting of entire leaves
|
|
Foliar
Symptoms - Color
|
brown,
yellow, tan
|
|
Root/Crown
Symptoms
|
none
|
|
Fungal
Signs
|
none
|
Note: Still not
sure if this is the right disease? The Turfgrass Disease
Identification program may be helpful. Or consult the experts at the Turf
Diagnostics Lab. Check the TurfFiles glossary for definitions
of unfamiliar terms.
FACTORS
AFFECTING DISEASE DEVELOPMENT
Brown blight is one of several
Helminthosporium diseases which survive in thatch during periods that are
unfavorable for disease development. These fungi are most active during periods
of cool (60 to 65°F) and wet weather. Brown blight is most severe on turf that
is growing slowly due to adverse weather conditions or improper management
practices. Shaded areas with little or no air movement result in weak turf and
extended periods of leaf wetness that favor infection and disease development.
Deficient or excessive nitrogen, excessive thatch, extended periods of leaf
wetness, drought stress, and mowing heights that are too low or too high
encourage the development of Helminthosporium diseases. Certain cultivars of
turfgrasses are very susceptible to injury from Helminthosporium diseases while
many of the newly released cultivars exhibit good resistance.
CULTURAL
CONTROL
Use turfgrass cultivars with
resistance to this disease when available. Use of resistant cultivars is one of
the best means of prevention. Select cultivars based on regional trials and
University recommendations. Use blends and mixtures of cool-season grasses
whenever possible. Fertilize to meet the nutritional needs of the turf but
avoid over-stimulation and the development of lush, succulent growth. Do not
apply more than one pound of nitrogen per 1,000 square feet in a single
application. Mowing should be done within the recommended range for each
turfgrass species. Keep the mower blades sharp to prevent open wounds through
which the fungus can enter. Reduce extended periods of leaf wetness by watering
deeply but infrequently to wet the entire root zone. Do not irrigate before
sunset or after sunrise, and ensure good surface and soil drainage. Remove unwanted
vegetation that impedes air movement and prune trees to allow for light
penetration. Power rake or hollow-tine aerify to remove excessive thatch and
reduce pathogen survival.
CHEMICAL
CONTROL
Brown blight can be controlled on
a preventative or curative basis. For best results, fungicides should be
applied in the early stages of disease development.
|
Fungicide
|
Efficacy (1)
|
Resistance Risk (2)
|
Class (3)
|
Products (4)
|
|
iprodione**
|
++++
|
4
|
dicarboxamide
|
26GT, Iprodione Pro
|
|
vinclozolin**
|
++++
|
4
|
dicarboxamide
|
Curalan, Touche
|
|
iprodione + thiophanate-methyl**
|
++++
|
6
|
dicarboxamide + benzimidazole
|
26/36, Fluid Fungicide, Pro Turf
|
|
mancozeb**
|
++++
|
2
|
dithiocarbamate
|
Fore, Dithane, Pentathlon, Protect
|
|
mancozeb + copper hydroxide**
|
++++
|
2
|
dithiocarbamate
|
Junction
|
|
azoxystrobin
|
++++
|
6
|
QoI
|
Heritage
|
|
azoxystrobin + propiconazole
|
++++
|
6
|
QoI + DMI
|
Headway
|
|
chlorothalonil**
|
+++
|
2
|
nitrile
|
Daconil, Chlorostar, Echo, Manicure
|
|
chlorothalonil + thiophanate-methyl**
|
+++
|
4
|
nitrile + benzimidazole
|
Spectro, ConSyst
|
|
chlorothalonil + propiconazole**
|
+++
|
3
|
nitrile + DMI
|
Concert
|
|
chlorothalonil + propiconazole + fludioxonil**
|
+++
|
2
|
nitrile + DMI + phenylpyrolle
|
Instrata
|
|
pyraclostrobin
|
+++
|
6
|
QoI
|
Insignia
|
|
propiconazole
|
++
|
4
|
DMI
|
Banner MAXX, Propiconazole G-Pro, Propiconazole Pro,
Quali-Pro Propiconazole, Savvi, Spectator
|
|
myclobutanil
|
+
|
4
|
DMI
|
Eagle
|
|
thiophanate-methyl
|
?
|
6
|
benzimidazole
|
3336, Fungo, T-Storm
|
|
flutolanil + thiophanate-methyl
|
?
|
6
|
carboxamide + benzimidazole
|
SysStar
|
|
triticonazole
|
?
|
2
|
DMI
|
Trinity, Triton
|
|
triadimefon + trifloxystrobin
|
?
|
6
|
DMI + QoI
|
Tartan, Armada
|
|
fludioxonil
|
?
|
2
|
phenylpyrolle
|
Medallion
|
|
fluoxastrobin
|
?
|
6
|
QoI
|
Disarm
|
|
trifloxystrobin
|
?
|
6
|
QoI
|
Compass
|
|
** Not for application to
residential lawns.
|
|
Footnotes:
|
|
(1)
|
Efficacy Codes:
|
|
++++
|
excellent control when
conditions are highly favorable for disease development
|
|
+++
|
good control when disease
pressure is high, or excellent control when disease pressure is moderate
|
|
++
|
good control when disease
pressure is moderate, excellent control when disease pressure is low
|
|
+
|
good control when disease pressure
is low
|
|
0
|
does
not provide adequate control under any conditions
|
|
?
|
cannot be rated due to
insufficient data
|
|
(2)
|
Resistance Risk:
|
|
1
|
Rotating and tank-mixing not necessary,
but recommended to avoid potential side effects from continuous use of same
chemical class.
|
|
2
|
Rotate to different chemical
class after 3-4 applications; tank-mixing not necessary.
|
|
3
|
Rotate to different chemical class
after 2-3 applications; tank-mixing not necessary.
|
|
4
|
Rotate to different chemical
class after 1-2 applications; tank-mixing not necessary.
|
|
6
|
Rotate to different chemical
class after 1-2 applications; tank-mixing with low or moderate risk product
recommended.
|
|
9
|
Rotate to different chemical
class after EVERY application; tank-mix with low or moderate risk product for
EVERY application.
|
|
(3)
|
Continual use of fungicides
with similar control mechanisms (modes of action) can result in fungi that
are resistant to some chemicals. Poor or ineffective disease control can be
expected when this occurs. Managers can reduce the chances of this happening
by mixing or alternating fungicides belonging to different chemical classes.
|
|
(4)
|
Recommendations of specific
chemicals are based upon information on the manufacturer's label and
performance in a limited number of trials. Because environmental conditions and
methods of application may vary widely, performance of the chemical will not
always conform to the safety and pest control standards indicated by
experimental data. When more than one brand name exists for an agricultural
chemical, the name of brand that first came onto the market is listed first.
Otherwise, brand names are listed in alphabetical order. The order in which
brand names are given is not an indication of a recommendation or criticism.
|
|
Recommendations for the use of
agricultural chemicals are included in this publication as a convenience to
the reader. The use of brand names and any mention or listing of commercial
products or services does not imply endorsement by North Carolina State University or discrimination against similar products or services not mentioned. Other
brand names may be labeled for use on turfgrasses. Individuals who use
agricultural chemicals are responsible for ensuring that the intended use
complies with current regulations and conforms to the product label. Be sure
to obtain current information about usage regulations and examine a current
product label before applying any chemical. For assistance, contact your
county's Cooperative Extension agent.
|
© North Carolina
State University. This information sheet was prepared by Lane P. Tredway, Gail
G. Wilkerson, Bridget R. Lassiter, Jenifer J. Reynolds, and Gregory S. Buol.
Departments of Plant Pathology and Crop Science, College of Agriculture &
Life Sciences, North Carolina State University. Prepared March
23, 2009. Available on-line at www.turffiles.ncsu.edu. This publication was
made possible through a grant provided by the Center for Turfgrass
Environmental Research & Education (CENTERE) whose purpose is to support
worthwhile projects that will benefit both the private sector and the public,
and protect the environment.
KEYWORDS FOUND IN THIS ARTICLE:
|