Rounds 4 Research: Bid for foursomes and golf packages at first-class courses across North and South Carolina. Proceeds benefit turfgrass research programs at North Carolina State University and Clemson University.
North Carolina Cooperative Extension
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences - NC State University
Turfgrass Council of North Carolina The North Carolina Turfgrass Research & Education Foundation (NCTF)
North Carolina Sports Turf Association
North Carolina Sod Producers Association

Pesticide Selection for Water Quality Protection (WQWM-154, WQWM-155, WQWM-156)

Article contains terms, results, and products that are targeted to turf professionals.
Art Bruneau
Feb 22, 2001
Printable PDF
(113.7 kB)

Pesticide Selection for Water Quality Protection

A. H. Bruneau, Extension Crop Science Specialist
R. J. Cooper, Turfgrass Research and Teaching
L. T. Lucas, Extension Plant Pathology Specialist


(Note: The following information is a supplement to the Water Quality Water Management series and replaces the Pesticide Leaching Potential Rating Tables found in publications WQWM-154, 155 and 156.)


While research has shown that pollution of surface and groundwater supplies from turfgrass pesticide application is uncommon, the turf manager should still strive to avoid potential environmental contamination when choosing a pesticide. Unfortunately, there is little information available to aid in choosing a chemical control based upon minimizing potential leaching. Although several computer models exist to evaluate leaching potential, they are difficult to use and require extensive training. In an effort to provide a relatively simple method for identifying pesticides with the least potential for contaminating groundwater, R.L. Warren and J. B. Weber of N C State University have developed a pesticide ranking system known as the Pesticide Leaching Potential (PLP) Index. The index uses several pesticide characteristics to estimate potential leaching to groundwater. These characteristics include the ability to bind to soil organic matter, time required for the pesticide to degrade (persistence), rate of application, and the amount of an application that actually penetrates the turf canopy and reaches the soil.

The PLP index for various turfgrass pesticides labeled for use in North Carolina can be found on the reverse side. The index is based on a scale of 0 - 100 with a higher number indicating an increased likelihood for leaching. For example, a rating of 5 would indicate that a material had a very low potential for leaching while a pesticide with a PLP index of 95 would have a very high probability for leaching and should be avoided, especially in environmentally sensitive areas.

It is important to note that the PLP index is determined primarily based on characteristics of the pesticide and that other factors in the turfgrass ecosystem also influence leaching potential. Potential leaching into groundwater is also affected by soil pH, soil type, photo decomposition (degradation by sunlight), microbial decomposition, volatilization (pesticide evaporation), and other factors.

To minimize leaching potential, it is generally best to choose pesticides which have a low PLP index when possible. If two possible pesticide choices have a similar PLP index (within 5 points of each other) their leaching potential is fairly similar. As a rough guideline, materials having a PLP index less than 40 would have a low leaching potential while a PLP index greater than 70 would indicate that potential leaching was a concern. Also, pesticides are more likely to leach in soils which are sandy, low in organic matter, and which have a pH of 6.0 or greater.

You should also keep in mind that leaching is only one of many considerations in selecting a pesticide. There will be some instances where a pesticide exhibits low leaching potential but because of its high potential toxicity to wildlife, such as fish, extra precautions may be necessary around water. These precautions should be mentioned on the label.

Choosing pesticides with low leaching potential is only one of many techniques available to turfgrass managers to help protect water quality. Contact your local Cooperative Extension Office for free publications regarding water quality protection.

Pesticide Leaching Potential Index

Table 1. Herbicides

Common Name

Trade Name

Rate *

Index **

Fenoxaprop

Acclaim

0.18

0

Prodiamine

Barricade

0.75

1

Diclofop

Illoxan

1.50

10

Pendimethalin

Pre-M

3.00

18

Dithiopyr

Dimension

0.50

20

Metolachlor

Pennant

4.00

22

Sethoxydim

Vantage

0.28

26

MSMA

MSMA

3.00

27

Trifluralin

Treflan

3.00

32

Pronamide

Kerb

1.50

34

Glyphosate

Roundup

4.00

36

Oxadiazon

Ronstar

3.00

36

Benefin

Balan

3.00

36

Bentazon

Basagran

2.00

36

DCPA

Dacthal

10.50

38

Ethofumasate

Prograss

1.00

41

2,4-D

2,4-D

0.75

41

DSMA

Methar

5.00

41

Metsulfuron

DMC

0.10

42

Isoxaben

Gallery

1.00

44

Bensulide

Betasan

10.00

44

Oryzalin

Surflan

3.00

44

Napropamide

Devrinol

3.00

46

Asulam

Asulox

2.00

47

Metribuzin

Sencor

0.50

48

Atrazine

Aatrex

2.00

52

Triclopyr

Turflon

2.00

53

Simazine

Princep

2.00

54

Dicamba

Banvel

0.50

54

Imazaquin

Image

0.50

58

Mecoprop

MCPP

1.75

61

Siduron

Tupersan

10.00

64

* Maximum recommended application rate (lb A.I./Acre)
** Pesticide Leaching Potential Index (0-100) where 0 = very low leaching potential and 100 = very high leaching potential.

 

Table 2. Fungicides

Common Name

Trade Name

Rate *

Index **

Vinclozolin

Curlan

2.70

20

Fosetyl-AI

Aliette

17.40

25

Thiophanate methyl

Clearys 3336

2.70

31

Anilazine

Dyrene

5.40

31

Iprodione

Chipco

2.50

33

Mancozeb

Fore

8.70

36

Triadimefon

Bayleton

1.30

43

Propiconazole

Banner

1.50

45

Chlorothalonil

Daconil

19.60

46

Metalaxyl

Subdue

1.36

50

Propamocarb

Banol

7.24

51

Fenarimol

Rubigan

2.00

51

Chloroneb

Terraneb

7.00

51

Benomyl

Tersan

2.70

55

Maneb

Manzate

13.00

56

Etridiazole

Koban

6.50

65

* Maximum recommended application rate (lb A.I./Acre)
** Pesticide Leaching Potential Index (0-100) where 0 = very low leaching potential and 100 = very high leaching potential.

 

Table 3. Insecticides

Common Name

Trade Name

Rate *

Index **

Cyfluthrin

Tempo

0.09

0

Permetrin

Astro

0.90

12

Fenoxycarb

Award

1.50

19

Chlorpyrifos

Dursban

1.00

19

Fenamiphos

Nemacur

10.00

36

Acephate

Orthene

3.00

36

Fonofos

Crusade

3.90

37

Bendiocarb

Turcam

4.10

38

Carbaryl

Sevin

2.10

39

Diazinon

Diazinon

4.30

41

Isofenphos

Oftanol

1.90

44

Isazofos

Triumph

2.00

44