Algae
[Cyanobacteria]
SYMPTOMS
Although
they do not infect grasses, blue-green algae are a significant pest problem in
the turfgrass industry. These organisms contain chlorophyll just like plants,
but they grow by producing chains of thread-like cells similar to fungi
Symptoms of algae appear in areas where the turf canopy has been thinned by
poor growing conditions or other pest activity. In these areas, a green or
black mat of fuzzy growth is evident in the turf canopy or on the surface of
the thatch. During periods of dry weather, this algal growth forms a dry,
cracking crust on the thatch surface that repels water and impedes turf
recovery.
|
algal growth in turf
|
Characteristic
|
Description
|
|
Host
Grass Species
|
all
turfgrasses; most problematic on putting green turf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Still not
sure if this is the right disease? The Turfgrass Disease
Identification program may be helpful. Or consult the experts at the Turf
Diagnostics Lab. Check the TurfFiles glossary for definitions
of unfamiliar terms.
FACTORS
AFFECTING DISEASE DEVELOPMENT
Algae may develop whenever
thinning of the turf canopy permits sufficient air, light, and water to reach
the thatch surface. Algal growth is most aggressive during the late spring,
summer, and early fall when warm, humid conditions are conducive to algae growth
and turf thinning. Low mowing heights, shady conditions, poor soil drainage,
and frequent irrigation also encourage algal growth in the turf canopy.
Algae have historically been
thought of as secondary colonizers, meaning that they only fill-in areas where
turf density has been reduced by some other problem. However, mounting evidence
indicates that high levels of algae activity can directly cause thinning of
putting green turf, possibly by production of toxins or competition for air,
water, and nutrients. An aggressive algae management program can greatly
increase the density and overall quality of putting greens during periods of
warm and humid weather.
CULTURAL
CONTROL
Maintenance of dense, healthy
turf is the most effective way to prevent algae invasions. Avoid establishing
turf in areas that are heavily shaded or poorly drained, or take steps to
correct these problems in established turf. Mow at the recommended height for
each turfgrass species, and increase mowing heights in shady areas to
compensate for the reduced light levels. Irrigation should be applied deeply
and infrequently; apply sufficient water to wet the entire root zone, and then
reapply as needed when the turf shows signs of wilt. Putting greens and other
heavily trafficked areas must be cultivated regularly to maintain soil drainage
and aeration.
CHEMICAL
CONTROL
Ammonium sulfate, hydrated lime,
or other materials can be applied to “burn” the algae in infested areas.
Extreme caution is needed when doing this, especially on golf course putting
greens, as these materials can also burn the turf or cause nutritional
imbalances in the soil.
The fungicides chlorothalonil and
mancozeb are also effective algaecides. These products will control algae on a
preventative or curative basis, but preventative applications are much more
effective. Repeat applications on a 10 to 14 day interval during warm, humid
weather provides excellent algae control and significantly increases the
density of putting green turfgrasses. Note that chlorothalonil and mancozeb are
not approved for application to residential lawns.
Fungicides containing copper
hydroxide should be used with caution, as copper can accumulate in the soil to
toxic levels after repeated applications. For this reason, copper hydroxide
should only be used under extreme circumstances to bring severe algae
infestations under control.
Once a severe algae infestation
has occurred, fungicide applications alone will not provide acceptable control.
Additional steps must be taken to physically break-up the mat of algal growth
so that the turf can recover. Spiking, aerification, verticutting, topdressing,
or combinations thereof are effective ways to accomplish this.
|
Fungicide
|
Efficacy (1)
|
Resistance Risk (2)
|
Class (3)
|
Products (4)
|
|
mancozeb**
|
++++
|
1
|
dithiocarbamate
|
Fore, Dithane, Protect
|
|
chlorothalonil**
|
++++
|
1
|
nitrile
|
Daconil, Chlorostar, Echo, Manicure
|
|
** Not for application to residential
lawns.
|
|
Footnotes:
|
|
(1)
|
Efficacy Codes:
|
|
++++
|
excellent control when
conditions are highly favorable for disease development
|
|
+++
|
good control when disease pressure
is high, or excellent control when disease pressure is moderate
|
|
++
|
good control when disease
pressure is moderate, excellent control when disease pressure is low
|
|
+
|
good control when disease
pressure is low
|
|
0
|
does not
provide adequate control under any conditions
|
|
?
|
cannot be rated due to
insufficient data
|
|
(2)
|
Resistance Risk:
|
|
1
|
Rotating and tank-mixing not
necessary, but recommended to avoid potential side effects from continuous use
of same chemical class.
|
|
2
|
Rotate to different chemical
class after 3-4 applications; tank-mixing not necessary.
|
|
3
|
Rotate to different chemical
class after 2-3 applications; tank-mixing not necessary.
|
|
4
|
Rotate to different chemical
class after 1-2 applications; tank-mixing not necessary.
|
|
6
|
Rotate to different chemical
class after 1-2 applications; tank-mixing with low or moderate risk product
recommended.
|
|
9
|
Rotate to different chemical class
after EVERY application; tank-mix with low or moderate risk product for EVERY
application.
|
|
(3)
|
Continual use of fungicides
with similar control mechanisms (modes of action) can result in fungi that
are resistant to some chemicals. Poor or ineffective disease control can be
expected when this occurs. Managers can reduce the chances of this happening
by mixing or alternating fungicides belonging to different chemical classes.
|
|
(4)
|
Recommendations of specific chemicals
are based upon information on the manufacturer's label and performance in a
limited number of trials. Because environmental conditions and methods of
application may vary widely, performance of the chemical will not always
conform to the safety and pest control standards indicated by experimental
data. When more than one brand name exists for an agricultural chemical, the
name of brand that first came onto the market is listed first. Otherwise,
brand names are listed in alphabetical order. The order in which brand names
are given is not an indication of a recommendation or criticism.
|
|
Recommendations for the use of
agricultural chemicals are included in this publication as a convenience to
the reader. The use of brand names and any mention or listing of commercial
products or services does not imply endorsement by North Carolina State University or discrimination against similar products or services not mentioned. Other
brand names may be labeled for use on turfgrasses. Individuals who use agricultural
chemicals are responsible for ensuring that the intended use complies with
current regulations and conforms to the product label. Be sure to obtain
current information about usage regulations and examine a current product
label before applying any chemical. For assistance, contact your county's
Cooperative Extension agent.
|
© North Carolina
State University. This information sheet was prepared by Fred Yelverton, Gail G.
Wilkerson, Leon Warren, Travis Gannon, and Gregory S. Buol. Department of Crop
Science, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, North Carolina State
University. Prepared November, 3, 2008. Available
on-line at www.turffiles.ncsu.edu. This publication was made possible through a
grant provided by the Center for Turfgrass Environmental Research &
Education (CENTERE) whose purpose is to support worthwhile projects that will
benefit both the private sector and the public, and protect the environment.