Pythium Root Rot
[Pythium
spp.]
SYMPTOMS
Pythium
root rot is a persistent problem in areas that are poorly drained or over-irrigated.
The disease can also occur in well-drained areas following extended periods of
rainfall. Pythium root rot can occur at any time of the year as long as
the soil remains saturated for several days or weeks. From a distance, symptoms
are orange or yellow and usually appear in irregular patterns, but occasionally
develop in spots or distinct patches. Symptoms of Pythium root rot may
spread in drainage patterns during periods of heavy rainfall. On individual
plants, the crowns, roots, rhizomes, and/or stolons will appear dark and
greasy. The depth and density of roots will be drastically reduced in affected
areas.
|
pythium root rot on bentgrass
|
Characteristic
|
Description
|
|
Host
Grass Species
|
all
|
|
Month(s)
with symptoms
|
all
|
|
Stand
Symptoms
|
irregular
distribution across turf stand
|
|
Foliar
Symptoms - Location/Shape
|
dieback
from leaf tip, blighting of entire leaves
|
|
Foliar
Symptoms - Color
|
tan,
yellow, orange
|
|
Root/Crown
Symptoms
|
roots,
stolons, rhizomes, and/or crowns dark brown or black
|
|
Fungal
Signs
|
none
|
Note: Still not
sure if this is the right disease? The Turfgrass Disease
Identification program may be helpful. Or consult the experts at the Turf
Diagnostics Lab. Check the TurfFiles glossary for definitions
of unfamiliar terms.
FACTORS
AFFECTING DISEASE DEVELOPMENT
There are
many species of Pythium that have the ability to cause root rot of
turfgrasses. As a result, Pythium root rot can develop at any time
during the growing season if the soil remains saturated for prolonged periods.
Poor surface or subsurface drainage, over-irrigation, heavy rainfalls, and
excessive thatch and organic matter accumulation are the most common factors
that lead to a Pythium root rot outbreak.
CULTURAL
CONTROL
Avoid
establishing turfgrasses in poorly drained areas that remain saturated for
extended periods. Golf course putting greens must be aerified and topdressed
regularly to control thatch and reduce organic matter accumulation. In general,
15% to 20% of the putting green surface area should be impacted by hollow-tine
aerification annually, and 5000 lbs of topdressing should be applied per 1000
ft2 each year. Pruning or removal of trees surrounding putting
greens to increase sunlight penetration and air movement will reduce Pythium
root rot activity. Installation of high-powered fans will also help to
alleviate the problem where air movement is restricted. For golf course putting
greens with poor internal drainage, reconstruction is the only practical
long-term solution for Pythium root rot.
CHEMICAL
CONTROL
Little is known about the
relative efficacy of fungicides for Pythium root rot control. Where this
disease has been a persistent problem, apply mefanoxam, fosetyl-Al, or
propamocarb every 14 to 21 days during the growing season or when rainfall
occurs for 2 to 3 consecutive days. For curative applications, first apply
ethazole then follow with an application of mefanoxam 2 to 3 days later. To
minimize the potential for foliar burn, ethazole must be watered-in immediately
after application with at least 1/8” of water. Applications of mefanoxam or
propamocarb should also be watered-in, but fosetyl-Al should be applied to the
foliage for best results.
|
Fungicide
|
Efficacy (1)
|
Resistance Risk (2)
|
Class (3)
|
Products (4)
|
|
ethazole**
|
+++
|
2
|
aromatic hydrocarbon
|
Koban, Terrazole
|
|
mefenoxam
|
+++
|
6
|
phenylamide
|
Subdue, Fenox, Mefenoxam, Quell
|
|
propamocarb
|
?
|
2
|
carbamate
|
Banol
|
|
fosetyl-Al**
|
?
|
2
|
phosphonate
|
Signature
|
|
phosphorous acid
|
?
|
2
|
phosphonate
|
Alude, Magellan, Vital, Resyst
|
|
azoxystrobin
|
?
|
6
|
QoI
|
Heritage
|
|
fluoxastrobin
|
?
|
6
|
QoI
|
Disarm
|
|
** Not for application to
residential lawns.
|
|
Footnotes:
|
|
(1)
|
Efficacy Codes:
|
|
|
++++
|
excellent control when
conditions are highly favorable for disease development
|
|
|
+++
|
good control when disease
pressure is high, or excellent control when disease pressure is moderate
|
|
|
++
|
good control when disease
pressure is moderate, excellent control when disease pressure is low
|
|
|
+
|
good control when disease
pressure is low
|
|
|
0
|
does
not provide adequate control under any conditions
|
|
|
?
|
cannot be rated due to
insufficient data
|
|
(2)
|
Resistance Risk:
|
|
|
1
|
Rotating and tank-mixing not necessary,
but recommended to avoid potential side effects from continuous use of same
chemical class.
|
|
|
2
|
Rotate to different chemical
class after 3-4 applications; tank-mixing not necessary.
|
|
|
3
|
Rotate to different chemical class
after 2-3 applications; tank-mixing not necessary.
|
|
|
4
|
Rotate to different chemical
class after 1-2 applications; tank-mixing not necessary.
|
|
|
6
|
Rotate to different chemical
class after 1-2 applications; tank-mixing with low or moderate risk product
recommended.
|
|
|
9
|
Rotate to different chemical
class after EVERY application; tank-mix with low or moderate risk product for
EVERY application.
|
|
(3)
|
Continual use of fungicides with
similar control mechanisms (modes of action) can result in fungi that are
resistant to some chemicals. Poor or ineffective disease control can be
expected when this occurs. Managers can reduce the chances of this happening
by mixing or alternating fungicides belonging to different chemical classes.
|
|
(4)
|
Recommendations of specific
chemicals are based upon information on the manufacturer's label and
performance in a limited number of trials. Because environmental conditions
and methods of application may vary widely, performance of the chemical will
not always conform to the safety and pest control standards indicated by
experimental data. When more than one brand name exists for an agricultural
chemical, the name of brand that first came onto the market is listed first.
Otherwise, brand names are listed in alphabetical order. The order in which
brand names are given is not an indication of a recommendation or criticism.
|
|
|
Recommendations for the use of agricultural
chemicals are included in this publication as a convenience to the reader.
The use of brand names and any mention or listing of commercial products or
services does not imply endorsement by North Carolina State University or
discrimination against similar products or services not mentioned. Other
brand names may be labeled for use on turfgrasses. Individuals who use
agricultural chemicals are responsible for ensuring that the intended use
complies with current regulations and conforms to the product label. Be sure
to obtain current information about usage regulations and examine a current
product label before applying any chemical. For assistance, contact your
county's Cooperative Extension agent.
|
© North Carolina State University. This information sheet was prepared
by Lane P. Tredway, Gail G. Wilkerson, Bridget R. Lassiter, Jenifer J.
Reynolds, and Gregory S. Buol. Departments of Plant Pathology and Crop Science,
College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, North Carolina State University.
Prepared April 29, 2008. Available on-line at
www.turffiles.ncsu.edu. This publication was made possible through a grant
provided by the Center for Turfgrass Environmental Research & Education
(CENTERE) whose purpose is to support worthwhile projects that will benefit
both the private sector and the public, and protect the environment.